On July 8, 2016, Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker signed a bill that provides new protections for transgender people. The new law bars discrimination against transgender people in public accommodations, defined as any place open to the public including public rest rooms and locker rooms. The Attorney General’s office has been tasked with issuing regulations or guidance for legal action against any person who asserts gender identity for an “improper purpose,” and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination will also develop guidelines to aid compliance with the law. The law goes into effect on October 1, 2016.
Category Archives: News
Massachusetts House of Representatives Passes Non-Compete Reform
On June 29, 2016, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed House bill 4434, An Act Relative to the Enforcement of Noncompetition Agreements. Non-compete reform has been brewing in the Massachusetts legislature for several years, but the reform sought by many may finally be here, if the bill is enacted. This bill contains two key provisions: an adoption of a version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and substantial reform of Massachusetts non-competition law, which thus far has been only addressed by the courts. The Uniform Trade Secrets Act section provides for injunctive relief and reasonable attorney’s fees to protect trade secrets, and supersedes any conflicting laws providing for civil remedies for trade secret misappropriation.
The non-compete reform represents significant changes to existing law. The bill provides that a non-compete agreement must comply with seven criteria to be valid and enforceable: (i) if entered into in connection with the commencement of employment, it must be in writing and signed by employer and employee, and state that employees have the right to consult with a lawyer; (ii) if entered into after commencement of employment, it must be supported by fair consideration independent from continued employment; (iii) it must be no broader than necessary to protect trade secrets, other confidential information, or the employer’s goodwill; (iv) it may not exceed a duration of 12 months unless the employee has misappropriated employee property, in which case it may be extended to 2 years; (v) it must be reasonable in geographic scope, defined as where the employee provided services or had a material presence; (vi) it must be reasonable in scope of proscribed activities in relation to the interests it protects; and (vii) it must be supported by a “garden leave clause” or something similar, defined as a payment from the employer to the employee during the restricted period.
Finally, the bill provides that non-competition agreements shall not be enforceable against certain categories of employees, including those classified as nonexempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and those terminated without cause or laid off.
While the Uniform Trade Secrets Act provision of the bill is unlikely to draw controversy, as it is generally consistent with current law in the Commonwealth, the House bill 4434 contains significant changes to non-competition law. Should this bill be enacted into law, employers will need to update their non-competition agreements to ensure enforceability.
Chris Strang Appointed to Lawyers for Affordable Justice Advisory Board
Partner Chris Strang recently accepted an appointment to serve on the Advisory Board for Lawyers for Affordable Justice (LAJ). Founded in January, 2016, LAJ is a collection of independent lawyers joining forces to provide legal services to low and moderate income clients at rates they can afford.
The LAJ attorneys are able to provide services at reduced rates by sharing overhead and expenses in a new incubator facility located in Kenmore Square. The program was designed as a collaborative effort by Boston University School of Law, Boston College Law School, and Northeastern University School of Law. It was made possible in part by a grant from the American Bar Association.
Entrepreneurial-minded recent graduates from each of these three law schools will serve as LAJ attorneys for two-year periods. Several experienced attorneys and law professors provide mentoring and training. The Advisory Board will monitor the program’s progress and make periodic recommendations.
Despite being only a few months old, LAJ is already making headlines in the local press.
Strang Scott Selected to Join Construction Lawyers Alliance
Strang, Scott, Giroux & Young, LLP, was recently selected to join the Construction Lawyers Alliance, a group devoted to providing a comprehensive collection of construction law resources prepared by a select group of construction lawyers nationally. Strang Scott is proud to join the Alliance and will continue to offer timely advice and updates on construction trends, laws and matters of interest to the construction industry. Strang Scott looks forward to participating in the national dialogue regarding matters of interest to the construction industry along with its colleagues in the Construction Lawyers Alliance.
Proposed Noncompete Legislation Could Reshape Employment Relationships in Massachusetts
Contractors Will Soon Be Able to Apply for Certification for Public Construction Online
The Massachusetts Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance (DCAMM) recently announced that contractors will soon be able to utilize an online application process for certification. It will include the ability to pay fees online as well as online access to documents such as Certificates of Eligibility. The website is expected to be ready in March, 2016. Follow the link below for more information.
Boston Globe Features Strang Scott Client, Mass Innovation Labs
Our friends at Mass Innovation Labs were once again featured in the Boston Globe. Mass Innovation Labs is changing the world of how companies lease and utilize laboratory space.
Meet the chief encouragement officer in Kendall Square
The Choices That Led Small Business Owners to Wealth
Our friends and clients who are entrepreneurs and small business owners will appreciate the insight in this recent New York Times article:
The Choices That Led Small Business Owners to Wealth
Boston Bar Foundation Adams Benefit
Strang Scott was honored to be a part of the 2016 Boston Bar Foundation’s Annual Adams Benefit. This year, over 1,000 attendees joined the Boston Bar Foundation at the Museum of Fine Arts, raising over $600,000 for legal aid services.
Our friends at The Danger Booth were at the event doing what they do best:
Strang Scott Prevails In Arguing that Public Awarding Authorities Have a Duty to Verify Validity of Payment Bonds
A Superior Court judge recently ruled in Kapiloff’s Glass, Inc. et.al. v. University of Massachusetts (UMASS), et.al., MICV2014-08766, that Massachusetts awarding authorities on public construction projects do, in fact, have a duty to confirm that the payment bonds submitted by general contractors are valid.
Strang Scott brought suit on behalf of four subcontractors who provided labor and materials on the University of Massachusetts at Lowell Dry Lab Renovations construction project. The general contractor failed to pay the subcontractors in full, so the subcontractors requested copies of the payment bond from the awarding authority. Soon after filing suit, the subcontractors learned that the general contractor was filing for bankruptcy, and that the payment bond was fake.
As discussed in a previous article, Strang Scott, in a case of first impression, argued that awarding authorities on public construction projects have statutory obligations under M.G.L. c. 149, s. 29 to verify that the payment bonds provided to them by general contractors are legitimately issued by sureties registered with the Massachusetts Division of Insurance. The University of Massachusetts argued that it was not an officer or agent of the Commonwealth within the meaning of the statute. The court ruled that this defense was “neither logical nor in accord with common sense.”
The court decision explained in great detail the remedial nature of the statute, and how its express purpose is to protect subcontractors, and not the Commonwealth. It cited many prior court decisions opining that the statute should be construed liberally to accomplish its intended purpose of getting subcontractors and material suppliers paid for their work.
Whether courts will find additional duties for awarding authorities on public construction projects in the future is uncertain, nor do we know whether the University of Massachusetts will appeal this decision. However, at least for now, this decision provides some comfort for subcontractors and material suppliers that some form of payment security should exist when they perform public work.


